Dwarven Brewmaster Paragon Path for 4E

Time to get my geek on.

In our long-running 4th Edition D&D game, the party hit 11th level, and thus needed to choose paragon paths. Most of them found something suitable, but Thorin Durthak, the dwarven fighter (played by my old friend Brandt) just wasn’t finding anything particularly interesting.

So we decided to make something up ourselves. How hard can it be?

Paragon paths start with three game effects:
- a path feature that affects gameplay in a persistent way (a feat, more or less)
- an encounter attack power
- an effect that happens when you spend an action point.

The paragon path we decided to invent is the Dwarven Brewmaster, in tribute to the many bad and good beers we’ve consumed during our sessions.

We took advantage of a session where we only had a couple of people available to start with a Vision Quest; Thorin, accompanied by two of his friends, spent a night in a hill giant bar, where he defended the honor of a hill giant maiden from the lord by challenging the lord to a drinking contest. His friends kept the lord’s minions and “hound” at bay with their wits and skills.

Dwarven Brewmaster
“Finish your drinks, boys, for it’s into the gates of Hell we’re headed next. Bottoms up!”

Brewing beer has been part of Dwarven culture since time immemorial. The earliest recipes are primitive by modern standards, including only hops, barley and water. Dwarven ingenuity has led to many different methods of brewing, involving complex apparatus, as well as ever-more-innovative means of storing and transporting beer to preserve its flavor.

Brewmasters are regarded with awe and some degree of fear by the rest of Dwarven society. Their experimentation with new frontiers in the brewing arts can sometimes result in unfortunate side effects, and they tend to be drunk most of the time. The constant drinking makes the Brewmaster resistant to many kinds of effects, and the various exotic brews can have powerful effects.

Path Features:

Refilling Action – when you spend an action point, you may roll a d20 and consult the following table.
1-5 No effect
6-15 Gain an additional use of any one Encounter power you possess
16-19 Gain an additional use of any one Daily power you possess
20 Gain an additional use of any one Daily power you possess and a temporary action point

Half in the Bag – you gain +5 to saving throws against being Dazed, Dominated or Stunned.

Heave
Dwarven Brewmaster Attack 11
Encounter – Standard Action
Close Blast 3
Target: Each creature in blast
Keywords: Acid
Attack: Constitution vs. Fort
Hit: Con modifier acid damage, and the target takes Con modifier ongoing acid damage (save ends), and the target must save or be knocked prone.

Fearless Testers Union, Local 256, at a recent meeting.

A farewell to Phosphorous from FTU #256

Bill “Phosphorous” Sears passed away today. I never got the chance to meet him, but his art graced a number of games I worked on, and I’m going to miss him.

About 10 years ago, my friends Rich and Iikka started making games as Digital Eel. They make games with style and a touch of insanity. I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to work on almost all of their games as a tester, starting in early beta stages, often before much of the game is fleshed out – there’s an engine there, but gameplay may be wildly unbalanced, the UI is still in flux, missions or levels are really limited. That sounds kind of painful, but I assure you, it’s fun.

Partly because Digital Eel makes games that are enjoyable to play, and that’s evident even in early half-finished versions. But mostly it’s fun because I get to have opinions about gameplay, storyline and the like, and those sometimes make it into the game. Nothing like seeing your requirements in the finished product to make you feel a sense of ownership.

There’s a fairly small group of guys (people, but they are in fact all guys) who have been beta testing Digital Eel games. Early, Rich started calling us the Fearless Testers – that’s even the label he put on us for the credits. My friend John Slade and I decided to unionize, in the event that a dispute ever broke out, to give ourselves collective bargain leverage. Or something. We might have been drinking at the time. So we dubbed ourselves “Fearless Testers Union, local 256,” a number chosen both to imply that we had a lot of people behind us, and because hey, powers of 2, we’re nerds.

Digital Eel is Rich and Iikka, but it’s also Phos. His brain-melting art graces the box design for Weird Worlds: Return to Infinite Space, which is one of my favorite games of all time. It’s funny, and challenging, and beautiful, and profound, and I’ve played and replayed it dozens of times. His art and his sense of weirdness is all over Digital Eel’s games. I’m proud to have worked on games with him, and I’m sad that I won’t get to do so again.

Farewell, Phos. I hope its weirder than you imagined where you are, because it’s less weird around here without you.

Fearless Testers Union, Local 256, at a recent meeting.

Baseball Retrospective – 2011 Maplewood Ironpigs

Thinking about the season:

This is, as I noted earlier, the first year for the coaches and most of the team in the A league. We had three 7th-graders, but only one of them (Jake) played in the A league last year – Nate was in traveling ball and AJ didn’t play in 6th grade. Two years ago, when we moved up to the B league as the Mudcats, we had a tough season – it was the first year pitching for any of the guys, which added a whole new dimension to the game.

Our team was, on the average, younger than most of the teams we were facing, and I noticed a pretty significant correlation between the age of the team and their performance – not a sure thing, but if you were to bet on the older team to win, you’d probably win your bet in most MAA games. This is not surprising, given the amount of growing most boys are doing between the ages of 11 and 13, but I saw height disparities of something like 18 inches between the tallest and the shortest players.

We really only lost to three teams. We played a total of 18 games this season – 12 regular-season, 3 summerfest and 3 tournament.

In the regular season, we lost to 3 teams: Giants in the first game of the season, Nationals and Royals in the last two.

In Summerfest, we lost to the Royals in game 1 and the Red Sox in game 3 (we beat the Cardinals in game 2, the only time we saw them all season).

In the tournament, we beat the Giants (putting us 1-1 on the season with them) in game 1, then lost to the Red Sox (again) in game 2 and to the Royals (again) in game 3.

So, teams we lost to at all: Giants, Nationals, Red Sox, Royals. But we came back and evened up the season with the Giants at 1-1, meaning (as I see it), that we only lost to three teams: Nationals, Red Sox (twice) and Royals (three times).

Marketing miss.

So Netflix hiked rates today, and people are upset.

I don’t get it. Why the angst? I looked, and as far as I can tell, it’s not a big deal – I’m finally getting charged a pittance for something I value highly.

Bear in mind, I signed up for Netflix back in 2002, and have had a 3-disc-at-a-time subscription the whole time. It’s $19.99, which is less than two premium margaritas at Don Pablo’s. On the other hand, I’ve had times when I’ve had a disc out for 3 months because I keep not making time to watch TV. When they introduced streaming as a free feature, I suddenly was getting ten times the value for my subscription. Taking the rate up to $23.99 for the same deal seems reasonable to me. If anything, I’ll drop the disc subscription (which I’m sure Netflix is just fine with, since they’re getting out of physical distribution as fast as they can) and actually save money.

It seems odd, though. Didn’t Netflix do focus tests? Did they leave out the nerds or something? I mean, your target market is “people who use the Internet a lot,” which means they have a disproportionate reach to their size, and the ability to create flash crowds with things like trending on Twitter. Even a small percentage of people who are really pissed off can make the story “people are angry about Netflix price hike” instead of the more desirable “Netflix clarifies pricing plans, increasing customer choice”.

I’ve met some of the Netflix people, (on the data and API side, not marketing), and they are smart, capable people. Clearly, though, somebody missed the key message that needed to go out. From the NYT article:

What cost $10 a month — online streams of movies plus one DVD by mail at a time — will now cost $16 a month, the company said…

No no no! The message you wanted to get out was “This is a 20% price cut on our most essential service.” Unlimited streaming for $8 a month? That’s a *great* offer.

Swing and a miss right there. Dig that back foot in, and watch it all the way to the bat next time. You’ll get ‘em.